American Judicial System
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • Securities
  • Government
  • Employment
  • News
American Judicial System
No Result
View All Result

Can Charges Be Dropped At A Preliminary Hearing

Edward Gates by Edward Gates
November 23, 2022
Can Charges Be Dropped At A Preliminary Hearing
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the next logical step is a preliminary hearing. This is the point at which the prosecution must present evidence to establish reasonable cause that you committed the crime(s) for which you have been arrested. If you are facing misdemeanor charges and can afford private counsel, your lawyer will almost certainly advise you not to accept an agreement without first exploring your options with a preliminary hearing. However, even if you cannot afford counsel and instead must rely on public defenders, it may still be in your best interests to opt for a preliminary hearing. In most cases, this means that the initial arraignment will be postponed until after your preliminary hearing. While they don’t represent as much of an advantage as they would if you were facing felony charges, there are multiple advantages to requesting a preliminary hearing if you must proceed with a public defender. However, it’s important to remember that this isn’t standard in all cases; it will depend on your particular set of circumstances.

Can Charges Be Dropped At A Preliminary Hearing?

The short answer is no. A preliminary hearing is a motion hearing where the judge decides if there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to trial. If the judge finds that there is not enough evidence, they will dismiss the case.

When Is A Preliminary Hearing Required?

1. Misdemeanor Charges

If you are facing misdemeanor charges, a preliminary hearing is required for all but the most minor of offenses. If a judge determines that the evidence presented by the prosecution is not sufficient to warrant a trial, the charges will be dismissed.

2. Felony Charges

If you are facing felony charges, a preliminary hearing is required unless your case is filed as an information and not an indictment. An information is filed by the prosecution after they have sufficient evidence that they believe will be able to prove their case at trial. If the judge determines that there is not enough evidence, the charges will be dismissed.

3. Jury Trial

If you are charged with a felony, a preliminary hearing is required unless the judge determines that there is not enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury. In this case, the judge will simply dismiss the charges.

4. Misdemeanor or Felony Trial Without a Preliminary Hearing

If you are charged with a felony and the judge determines that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury, the charges will not be dismissed. However, if the prosecutor believes that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant a jury trial, they will ask for another preliminary hearing. This hearing will be held within twenty-one days of the initial hearing. If the judge finds that there is not enough evidence, the charges will be dismissed and you may proceed with your trial by jury.

5. A Complicated Case

If a preliminary hearing is required, you will be given an opportunity to present your case to a judge. You may also have the opportunity to ask questions of the prosecution and have them ask questions of you. This is called a “cross-examination.”

What Happens During A Preliminary Hearing?

1. The Judge Will Hear the Case

If the judge decides that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial, they will call the case. The prosecutor and defense attorney each have one opportunity to present their case to the judge.

2. The Prosecutor Will Present Evidence in Support of the Charges

The prosecution will present evidence in support of the charges so that they may show that they have enough evidence to warrant a trial.

3. The Defense Attorney Will Present Evidence in Support of the Defendant’s Case

The defense attorney will present evidence in support of his or her client’s case so that he or she may show that there is not enough evidence for a trial. However, this does not mean that you are completely innocent; it simply means that there is not enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury.

4. The Judge Will Decide Whether There Is Enough Evidence to Warrant a Trial by Jury

If the judge finds that there is not enough evidence, they will dismiss the charges. However, if they find that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury, the charges will not be dismissed.

5. The Judge Will Decide Whether There Is Enough Evidence to Warrant a Jury Trial

If the judge finds that there is not enough evidence, they will dismiss the charges and you may proceed with your trial by jury. If the judge finds that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury, the charges will be dismissed.

Pros Of Having A Preliminary Hearing

1. The Judge Will Decide Whether There Is Enough Evidence to Warrant a Trial by Jury

If the judge finds that there is not enough evidence, they will dismiss the charges and you may proceed with your trial by jury. If the judge finds that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury, the charges will be dismissed. The judge will decide whether or not there is enough evidence to go forward with a trial.

2. You Have an Opportunity to Present Your Case

You have an opportunity to present your case during this hearing. This means that you are able to present all of your arguments in support of your innocence and argue against any possible defenses that you may have.

3. The Judge Will Decide Whether There Is Enough Evidence To Warrant A Trial By Jury

If the judge finds that there is not enough evidence, they will dismiss the charges and you may proceed with your trial by jury. If the judge finds that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury, the charges will be dismissed. The judge will decide whether or not there is enough evidence to go forward with a trial.

4. You Can Prove Your Innocence, Which Can Help Your Case

In order for you to prove your innocence, you must show that there is not enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury. This means that you must show how your actions are justified and how they do not warrant a trial.

5. You Can Present Your Argument During the Preliminary Hearing

During this hearing you have an opportunity to present all of your arguments in support of your innocence and argue against any possible defenses that you may have. 

Disadvantages Of A Preliminary Hearing

1. You Can’t Present Your Case During this Hearing

In order for you to prove your innocence, you must show that there is not enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury. This means that you must show how your actions are justified and how they do not warrant a trial.

2. You Can’t Present Your Argument During the Preliminary Hearing

During this hearing you have an opportunity to present all of your arguments in support of your innocence and argue against any possible defenses that you may have.  

3. You Cannot Appeal the Judge’s Decision

If the judge decides that there is enough evidence to warrant a trial by jury, you cannot appeal this decision. If you are found guilty of the charges brought against you, then you will be required to serve your sentence according to the laws of that state.

Conclusion

A preliminary hearing offers several advantages. It’s a way to get the charges against you dropped more quickly and avoid a trial entirely. However, it also prolongs the case, which could be disruptive to your work and personal life. If you are charged with a misdemeanor, it is almost always in your best interests to proceed with a preliminary hearing. This is because it’s your best chance of the charges against you being dropped. If you are charged with a felony, it’s more complicated. You may be able to proceed directly to a preliminary hearing if the crime you are charged with is a wobbler.

Previous Post

Can I Sue My Employer For Not Paying Me Correctly

Next Post

Can You Go To Jail At A Preliminary Hearing

Edward Gates

Edward Gates

Edward “Eddie” Gates is a retired corporate attorney. When Eddie is not contributing to the American Justice System blog, he can be found on the lake fishing, or traveling with Betty, his wife of 20 years.

Related Posts

Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases
Laws

Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases

Intent vs. Outcome
Laws

Intent vs. Outcome: How to Prove You’re Not a White Collar Criminal

The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
Laws

The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident

How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
Laws

How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers

Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident Cyclists in Arizona share the road with fast-moving vehicles daily, often placing their safety in the hands of motorists. While the open roads may offer freedom, they also come with serious risks when drivers fail to respect cyclists' space. Arizona's Safe Passing Law plays a vital role in determining fault and guiding compensation after a bicycle-related crash. Understanding this law becomes essential for anyone seeking the guidance of a bicycle accident lawyer in Phoenix. Safe passing regulations influence liability assessments, affect settlement negotiations, and impact how claims are litigated. Recognizing the law's practical implications allows injured cyclists to assert their rights more effectively. Overview of Arizona’s Safe Passing Requirements Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) §28-735 outlines the Safe Passing Law, requiring motorists to allow a minimum of three feet of clearance when overtaking a bicycle. This rule applies whether the cyclist is in a designated bike lane or sharing the main roadway with other vehicles. The intent is clear: create a buffer that protects cyclists from sudden swerves, side mirrors, or unexpected road debris. The three-foot rule isn’t merely a guideline—it carries legal weight. Violating it constitutes a traffic offense and often signals negligence in the context of personal injury claims. The Law’s Role in Determining Driver Negligence When a collision involves a motorist and a cyclist, one of the first legal questions is whether the driver upheld their duty of care. Failure to provide the mandated clearance supports a finding of negligence, which becomes foundational to any injury claim. A bicycle accident lawyer in Phoenix will closely examine crash scene evidence—such as tire marks, vehicle position, and witness statements—to assess compliance with the Safe Passing Law. Proving that a driver violated this statute strengthens the injured cyclist’s argument and often influences how insurance adjusters value the claim. How Violations Influence Compensation Calculations Arizona follows a pure comparative negligence model, allowing injured parties to recover damages even if partially at fault. However, the percentage of fault assigned to each party directly impacts the financial recovery. When a motorist breaches the Safe Passing Law, that violation typically increases their share of responsibility. Demonstrating such misconduct may significantly shift the fault allocation, potentially increasing the injured cyclist’s compensation. Photographs, dash cam footage, and official citations all serve as evidence to show a breach of this duty. Importance of Scene Documentation and Witness Accounts After any bike accident, immediate documentation proves essential. Arizona’s Safe Passing Law is often interpreted based on distance, which can be challenging to measure accurately without proper evidence. Cyclists should attempt to gather details from witnesses, obtain police reports, and photograph road conditions if physically able. Legal teams use this information to create collision reconstructions and demonstrate how the driver encroached on the cyclist’s space. Because the law centers on proximity, even subtle lane deviations can establish liability. Witnesses who observed an unsafe pass become critical to affirming legal violations. Interplay Between Local Ordinances and State Law While ARS §28-735 applies statewide, cities like Phoenix may implement additional traffic rules that reinforce or expand safe passing protocols. In some cases, local regulations include stricter language or define more precise boundaries on shared roadways. Understanding the interaction between municipal codes and state law offers an advantage in personal injury litigation. Attorneys often reference both layers of regulation to present a comprehensive argument for liability. Local traffic citations further support claims of driver misconduct under both legal frameworks. Impact on Motorist Insurance Disputes Insurance carriers assess fault based on police reports, statutes, and the circumstances surrounding the incident. When drivers ignore the Safe Passing Law, they expose themselves to scrutiny not only from law enforcement but also from their insurers. Claims adjusters may attempt to minimize the severity of an infraction or question the cyclist's behavior. However, when clear evidence shows that a motorist failed to allow three feet of space, it becomes harder to dispute liability. Legal representatives utilize this leverage to challenge lowball offers and negotiate for fair settlements. Commercial Vehicles and Elevated Legal Expectations When delivery trucks, service vans, or rideshare vehicles collide with cyclists, the standards become even more stringent. Commercial drivers often receive specialized training and are expected to be thoroughly familiar with traffic laws and regulations. and regulations Violations of the Safe Passing Law involving commercial vehicles may trigger company liability or federal regulatory scrutiny. This elevates the legal stakes and provides injured cyclists with additional avenues for compensation. Corporate policies, driver logs, and internal training materials often become evidence in these cases. Preventable Harm and the Public Safety Argument Violations of the Safe Passing Law go beyond individual negligence; they represent a larger disregard for public safety. Arizona enacted the law to protect cyclists from serious and preventable harm. When motorists fail to follow it, the consequences are often catastrophic. Legal teams may incorporate this public safety aspect into their case strategy, especially when seeking punitive damages. Courts often consider whether a driver’s conduct showed a conscious disregard for others’ well-being. The Safe Passing Law provides a measurable benchmark for such assessments. Strategic Use of Safe Passing Law in Civil Claims For injured cyclists, the Safe Passing Law offers more than a safety guideline—it serves as a legal tool. Demonstrating that a motorist violated this statute provides substantial grounds for establishing fault, increasing claim value, and countering comparative negligence arguments. Thorough documentation, knowledgeable legal representation, and a clear understanding of the law's implications all contribute to stronger and more effective injury claims. After a bike crash, the path to recovery often depends on proving that the driver's actions failed to meet the standard set by Arizona's Safe Passing Law.
Laws

Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident

Navigating GPS Tracking Laws by State
Laws

Navigating GPS Tracking Laws by State: Legal and Social Implications

Next Post
Can You Go To Jail At A Preliminary Hearing

Can You Go To Jail At A Preliminary Hearing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases
  • Intent vs. Outcome: How to Prove You’re Not a White Collar Criminal
  • The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
  • How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
  • Top Reasons to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer

Categories

  • Business (6)
  • Digital Marketing (2)
  • Employment (38)
  • Financial (2)
  • Government (22)
  • Laws (1,252)
  • Lawyers (557)
  • News (305)
  • Securities (44)
  • Social Media (1)
AJS logo

We are a blog that talks about different law-related topics. We focus primarily on the business side of law, including technology and innovation in the legal industry. We’ve been around since 2015 so we have an extensive archive of articles to choose from. Learn more at AJS Blog!

editor@ajs.org

Categories

  • Business
  • Digital Marketing
  • Employment
  • Financial
  • Government
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • News
  • Securities
  • Social Media

Follow Us

 

Recent News

  • Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases
  • Intent vs. Outcome: How to Prove You’re Not a White Collar Criminal
  • The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2025 American Judicial System- All Rights Reserved By AJS

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • Securities
  • Government
  • Employment
  • News

© 2025 American Judicial System- All Rights Reserved By AJS