American Judicial System
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • Securities
  • Government
  • Employment
  • News
American Judicial System
No Result
View All Result

Why Indiana’s Strict Enforcement of Their ‘Move Over’ Law Works

Janice Ruiz by Janice Ruiz
July 13, 2024
Why Indiana’s Strict Enforcement of Their ‘Move Over’ Law Works
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Cruising down South Dakota’s 80 mph I-90 feels about as free as free can feel. Let your hair down, baby, it’s time to fly. In those Easy Rider-type moments, it can be easy to miss the roadside worker. And since you’re zipping at 90 to 95 mph, you might not see the roadside worker in the highlight-green vest until it’s too late.

From 1982 through 2020, nearly 30,000 people have died in work zone accidents. This includes workers, drivers, passengers, and bystanders. In 1994, a South Carolina paramedic was tending to a driver who had slid off the road when he was struck by a rubbernecker driving at about 45 mph. After recovering from his injuries, he worked to create and pass a law requiring passing drivers to move over a lane while emergency vehicles were stopped on the side of the road. In 1996, the nation’s first “Move Over” law was passed in South Carolina. By 2012, all 50 states had implemented “Move Over” laws.

In 2023, Indiana amended their 1999 “Move Over” law to expand the law from focusing on emergency vehicles to any vehicle with activated hazard lights that have pulled over to the side of the road. If the driver cannot move over, they must reduce their speed at least 10 mph below the posted speed limit. Failure to move over or slow down can result in a Class B Misdemeanor, that’s up to $1000 in fines and/or up to 180 days in jail. And Indiana State Troopers are ready to enforce.

And it’s their kind of enforcement of that law that might make this very necessary law stick and for good.

Importance of “Move Over” Laws

The whole idea of Move Over laws is not to inconvenience you, it’s about safety. Or, if you’re selfish, not having some human body damage your vehicle. First responders, paramedics, firefighters, truck drivers, and other workers you’d often find by flashing lights, often find themselves in high-risk situations while they do their jobs on the side of the road.

The threat of being struck by a driver flying down the highway is high enough that it is a legitimate risk to safety. The easiest way to help mitigate that risk is to ask drivers to move over a lane or to significantly slow down. Despite these laws being the norm for nearly thirty years, people still struggle to adhere to them. In 2022, North Carolina’s Department of Transportation reported that safety vehicles had been struck 26 times. That juicy bit of data underscores the need for more awareness.

Raising Awareness

The paramedic that inspired “Move Over” laws, James D. Garcia, has been an assertive and passionate advocate for raising awareness on the critical need to change lanes or slow down when passing a vehicle on the side of the road. A study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) showed that about one-third of Americans are completely ignorant of “Move Over” laws.

To be fair, it’s not exactly a sexy PSA announcement. It’s difficult to make “change lanes or slow down” into a catchy jingle. The current NHTSA infographic, from a graphic designer’s standpoint, is… not great.

That’s why Garcia’s public service works are so important. Speaking to someone who inspired the laws, who dedicates his life to informing the public of something so important, can make a greater impact on the public’s awareness of “Move Over” laws.

What Is Indiana Doing Differently?

Traffic laws vary state-by-state, so enforcement of “Move Over” laws will be different as you travel across the country. For instance, in Pennsylvania, for ignoring their “Steer Clear” law, as they call it, you could get a fine upwards of $500 for the first offense. Georgia also penalizes at $500.

If you’re working with an Indianapolis car accident lawyer, they will tell you that Indiana has taken the public’s ignorance seriously and will penalize drivers with a Class B misdemeanor, $1000 in fines, and jail time.

“The State Police has written 15,550 tickets. That’s a lot of tickets, and that means there are a lot of people that don’t have a caring bone in their body about those highway workers,” said Sgt. Ray Poole, ISP.

Tickets don’t appear to be all that effective. “The point of the conversation is not how many tickets we can write,” Indiana State Police Sgt. Brian Walker told WPTA. “The point of the conversation is traffic safety and what we could be doing and should be doing to make our roadways safer.”

The law is pretty clear:

“Upon approaching a stationary authorized emergency vehicle, when the authorized emergency vehicle is giving a signal by displaying alternately flashing red, red and white, or red and blue lights, a person who drives an approaching vehicle shall:

-Proceed with due caution, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to that of the authorized emergency vehicle, if possible with due regard to safety and traffic conditions, if on a highway having at least four (4) lanes with not less than two (2) lanes proceeding in the same direction as the approaching vehicle; or

-Proceed with due caution, reduce the speed of the vehicle to a speed at least ten (10) miles per hour less than the posted speed limit, maintaining a safe speed for road conditions, if changing lanes would be impossible or unsafe.”

Between a $1000 fine, jail time, a stain on your driving record, and even the suspension or revoking of your license should be enough to shake drivers awake and be aware of this safety law.

The More Drivers Are Aware, The Safer We Are

It’s an easy adjustment for drivers to learn to change lanes or slow down if there is a vehicle stopped on the side of the road. It’s minimal effort with profoundly positive outcomes. But people aren’t aware of it, and the local government’s failure to effectively inform the public has left responsibility in the hands of law enforcement. Since they are often the victims of these accidents, it makes sense they would want to come down hard on drivers who fail to adhere to a simple law.

Punitive measures can definitely be effective, but usually after the fact. Public awareness campaigns are sorely needed to hammer this safety law into people’s brains. We, as Americans, are pretty hardwired to reflexively yell, “you can’t tell me what to do!” But we do care about safety and especially if it requires minimal effort. “Move Over” laws are common sense, simple adjustments any driver can make. All they need to do is be aware of it.

Previous Post

The Role Of A Family Attorney In Child Custody Cases

Next Post

How Workers Comp Scams Hurt Other Workers

Janice Ruiz

Janice Ruiz

Janice Ruiz is a paralegal who comes from a long line of legal professionals in her family. When not working or writing, she enjoys watching documentaries about true crime events.

Related Posts

The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
Laws

The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident

How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
Laws

How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers

Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident Cyclists in Arizona share the road with fast-moving vehicles daily, often placing their safety in the hands of motorists. While the open roads may offer freedom, they also come with serious risks when drivers fail to respect cyclists' space. Arizona's Safe Passing Law plays a vital role in determining fault and guiding compensation after a bicycle-related crash. Understanding this law becomes essential for anyone seeking the guidance of a bicycle accident lawyer in Phoenix. Safe passing regulations influence liability assessments, affect settlement negotiations, and impact how claims are litigated. Recognizing the law's practical implications allows injured cyclists to assert their rights more effectively. Overview of Arizona’s Safe Passing Requirements Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) §28-735 outlines the Safe Passing Law, requiring motorists to allow a minimum of three feet of clearance when overtaking a bicycle. This rule applies whether the cyclist is in a designated bike lane or sharing the main roadway with other vehicles. The intent is clear: create a buffer that protects cyclists from sudden swerves, side mirrors, or unexpected road debris. The three-foot rule isn’t merely a guideline—it carries legal weight. Violating it constitutes a traffic offense and often signals negligence in the context of personal injury claims. The Law’s Role in Determining Driver Negligence When a collision involves a motorist and a cyclist, one of the first legal questions is whether the driver upheld their duty of care. Failure to provide the mandated clearance supports a finding of negligence, which becomes foundational to any injury claim. A bicycle accident lawyer in Phoenix will closely examine crash scene evidence—such as tire marks, vehicle position, and witness statements—to assess compliance with the Safe Passing Law. Proving that a driver violated this statute strengthens the injured cyclist’s argument and often influences how insurance adjusters value the claim. How Violations Influence Compensation Calculations Arizona follows a pure comparative negligence model, allowing injured parties to recover damages even if partially at fault. However, the percentage of fault assigned to each party directly impacts the financial recovery. When a motorist breaches the Safe Passing Law, that violation typically increases their share of responsibility. Demonstrating such misconduct may significantly shift the fault allocation, potentially increasing the injured cyclist’s compensation. Photographs, dash cam footage, and official citations all serve as evidence to show a breach of this duty. Importance of Scene Documentation and Witness Accounts After any bike accident, immediate documentation proves essential. Arizona’s Safe Passing Law is often interpreted based on distance, which can be challenging to measure accurately without proper evidence. Cyclists should attempt to gather details from witnesses, obtain police reports, and photograph road conditions if physically able. Legal teams use this information to create collision reconstructions and demonstrate how the driver encroached on the cyclist’s space. Because the law centers on proximity, even subtle lane deviations can establish liability. Witnesses who observed an unsafe pass become critical to affirming legal violations. Interplay Between Local Ordinances and State Law While ARS §28-735 applies statewide, cities like Phoenix may implement additional traffic rules that reinforce or expand safe passing protocols. In some cases, local regulations include stricter language or define more precise boundaries on shared roadways. Understanding the interaction between municipal codes and state law offers an advantage in personal injury litigation. Attorneys often reference both layers of regulation to present a comprehensive argument for liability. Local traffic citations further support claims of driver misconduct under both legal frameworks. Impact on Motorist Insurance Disputes Insurance carriers assess fault based on police reports, statutes, and the circumstances surrounding the incident. When drivers ignore the Safe Passing Law, they expose themselves to scrutiny not only from law enforcement but also from their insurers. Claims adjusters may attempt to minimize the severity of an infraction or question the cyclist's behavior. However, when clear evidence shows that a motorist failed to allow three feet of space, it becomes harder to dispute liability. Legal representatives utilize this leverage to challenge lowball offers and negotiate for fair settlements. Commercial Vehicles and Elevated Legal Expectations When delivery trucks, service vans, or rideshare vehicles collide with cyclists, the standards become even more stringent. Commercial drivers often receive specialized training and are expected to be thoroughly familiar with traffic laws and regulations. and regulations Violations of the Safe Passing Law involving commercial vehicles may trigger company liability or federal regulatory scrutiny. This elevates the legal stakes and provides injured cyclists with additional avenues for compensation. Corporate policies, driver logs, and internal training materials often become evidence in these cases. Preventable Harm and the Public Safety Argument Violations of the Safe Passing Law go beyond individual negligence; they represent a larger disregard for public safety. Arizona enacted the law to protect cyclists from serious and preventable harm. When motorists fail to follow it, the consequences are often catastrophic. Legal teams may incorporate this public safety aspect into their case strategy, especially when seeking punitive damages. Courts often consider whether a driver’s conduct showed a conscious disregard for others’ well-being. The Safe Passing Law provides a measurable benchmark for such assessments. Strategic Use of Safe Passing Law in Civil Claims For injured cyclists, the Safe Passing Law offers more than a safety guideline—it serves as a legal tool. Demonstrating that a motorist violated this statute provides substantial grounds for establishing fault, increasing claim value, and countering comparative negligence arguments. Thorough documentation, knowledgeable legal representation, and a clear understanding of the law's implications all contribute to stronger and more effective injury claims. After a bike crash, the path to recovery often depends on proving that the driver's actions failed to meet the standard set by Arizona's Safe Passing Law.
Laws

Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident

Navigating GPS Tracking Laws by State
Laws

Navigating GPS Tracking Laws by State: Legal and Social Implications

When To Pursue Commercial Litigation
Laws

When To Pursue Commercial Litigation: Key Triggers for Businesses

Truck Accident Settlements
Laws

Truck Accident Settlements: Why Early Offers Are Rarely Fair

Next Post
How Workers Comp Scams Hurt Other Workers

How Workers Comp Scams Hurt Other Workers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
  • How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
  • Top Reasons to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer
  • Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident
  • 5 Important Questions to Ask a Pasadena Personal Injury Lawyer Before Hiring

Categories

  • Business (6)
  • Digital Marketing (2)
  • Employment (38)
  • Financial (2)
  • Government (22)
  • Laws (1,250)
  • Lawyers (557)
  • News (305)
  • Securities (44)
  • Social Media (1)
AJS logo

We are a blog that talks about different law-related topics. We focus primarily on the business side of law, including technology and innovation in the legal industry. We’ve been around since 2015 so we have an extensive archive of articles to choose from. Learn more at AJS Blog!

editor@ajs.org

Categories

  • Business
  • Digital Marketing
  • Employment
  • Financial
  • Government
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • News
  • Securities
  • Social Media

Follow Us

 

Recent News

  • The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
  • How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
  • Top Reasons to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2025 American Judicial System- All Rights Reserved By AJS

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • Securities
  • Government
  • Employment
  • News

© 2025 American Judicial System- All Rights Reserved By AJS